COMMENT | Budget 2021: Job creation as the number one economic agenda

COMMENT | No other economic concern is more important than the question of jobs. We should place the agenda of job creation front and centre. And the government should be the catalyst to drive this agenda.

Through Budget 2021, over a period of two years, the government should commit to a national mission of creating 1 million jobs for Malaysians, paying between RM2,500 and RM4,000 per month. Doing so will cushion the economic fallout of Covid-19 and, crucially, position us to build back better.

Faced with this once-in-century political, economic and health triple crises, affecting the entire world and with no end in sight, governments shall use all public policy tools available at its disposal to mobilise societal resources to create jobs.

Before we move further, let’s agree on the need to create demand to keep the economy afloat. Some 60 percent of our GDP is made up of consumer spending. If consumer demand across the board shrinks, the economy will contract further, and risks falling into a vicious cycle, resulting in massive loss of jobs and social unrest. Hence, safeguarding consumers’ livelihood has become inextricably linked to the well-being of the entire economy.

Let us recognise also that the only economies that have successfully kept Covid-19 at bay such as China, Vietnam, Taiwan, Hong Kong and South Korea, are doing alright now economically. But historically, even these economies have been heavily dependent on export to the United States and Europe in the last half century. 

If the United States’ middle class shrinks even further due to the massive job losses that we have seen over the last eight months, Americans will consume less exports from Asia. Thus, even those economies that have better contained Covid-19 will still suffer job losses in the export sectors and service sectors, particularly tourism, as international travel seems destined to remain undesirable for a long time.

The economy is the collective manifestation of individual expectations. Our spending depends on our expectations. In light of this, Malaysia could see its economy shrink, and Malaysians may suffer even more job losses in the months to come if all economic actors collectively expect that demand for goods and services to fall, whether due to falling exports or further lockdowns due to spikes in new Covid-19 cases. 

To put it more starkly, more and more people will decide not to spend if they think they may lose their jobs and sources of income, even if they haven’t yet at present.

According to the Social Security Organisation (Socso), 90,000 jobs have been lost this year which represents 278 percent of the same period in 2019. World Bank estimates that the Malaysian economy would shrink by 4.9 percent in 2020, while Bank Negara estimates a contraction between 3.5 percent and 5.5 percent.

Transfers, such as welfare aid, cash transfers et cetera, can to an extent, mitigate the loss of income, and the government should be as empathetic as it can in this regard. But transfers are not a perfect solution and are very much unsustainable to maintain in the long run. Hence, if the government is not actively seeking to create jobs through public policy, we are staring at a very grim situation.

Ensuring Malaysians have decent jobs and decent pay in time of crisis is economically and socially necessary. Massive job losses often lead to social unrests and the rise of right-wing populism. Moreover, a job also has non-economic benefits. It is integral to a person’s identity, self-esteem and his or her overall wellbeing.

We need to accept the fact that some industries, some sectors and specific firms will suffer during this crisis. For example, airlines will probably only see air travel return to the 2019 levels in at least three years’ time. By the same token, tourism will suffer, too. If we have the opportunity to save an airline or a hotel, we should try our best. 

But the more important task for the government and for society as a whole is to ensure that flight attendants or tour guide operators, who are at high risk of losing their jobs, have something else to do in the next two years. Even if it entails a pay cut, we should aim for that to be at least a decent job with decent pay.

We must also not forget that there are up to 500,000 Malaysians who work as low-pay labour in Singapore, earning less than S$2,000 per month. Many of them are in the services sector in Singapore. I bet at least a third of workers in Singapore’s hotel sector, from bellboys to chefs, are from Malaysia. If they lose their jobs in Singapore, they will come home and look for work and income as well.

Therefore, we are like climbing a slippery slope with sand pouring down. When pilots are piloting Grab cars, and if the government sits back and does nothing to create more jobs, things will just get from bad to worse.

Let me be very clear, I am not saying the government has to pay for all the new jobs created. What I am advocating is for the government to use all the policy tools at its disposal to create jobs.

I speak of “national mission” in the manner that economist Mariana Mazzucato advocates. That the economy is not growing for its own sake. We grow the economy to achieve socially desirable outcomes that we cherish. And the market needs policy orientation. We need “mission-oriented markets”.

The missions at hand in this challenging time are to ensure that Malaysians have good jobs to put food on the table, while in this process we also strive to build back better. For instance, building a green sector to create jobs.

There is no running away from the government creating some jobs through its payroll. Researchers from progressive think tank Research for Social Advancement (Refsa), of which I am chairperson, have argued that the government can and should run a higher budget deficit as every other country on earth is doing so. 

As long as the spending doesn’t go to waste or to corruption but goes into creating jobs and investing into the future, the positive impact on the economy will be many times greater than the original investment. This is an argument that rating agencies should also listen to, instead of blindly applying outdated formulas based on blinkered ideology to evaluate a nation’s fiscal policy.

Hafiz Noor Sham, a visiting fellow at Refsa, suggested that the government hire more health workers. The government has thus far spent RM1.7 billion to fight Covid-19. I would say this is inadequate as the economy depends so much on containing the Covid-19 situation. 

There should be a “whole-of-government” approach to get the entire machinery to fight Covid-19. For instance, given that members of the armed forces are deployed to assist the police, some police officers can be deployed to do contact tracing. 

Or the government could hire say 20,000 Malaysians at RM2,500 to RM4,000 for two years, either directly or through contracting firms active in the services sector, that are currently at a standstill. 

The role of firms here should not be about profits or getting a bailout, but as about being an efficient organiser of labour. Given a short period of training, a tour guide or a flight attendant would have no problem of conducting contact tracing, or helping to manage temporary health care facilities.

The more proficient ones among these workers should be integrated into a longer-term plan to build a more comprehensive care system such as childcare and elderly care to help Malaysia facilitate more women into the workforce, as well as to prepare the country for an ageing society.

But the role of the government is really to use all its policy tools to push for the creation of jobs for Malaysians. Here are three examples:-

1. Glove industry – recently there have been talks of imposing a windfall tax on the glove manufacturers. I would prefer to use all existing and, if needed, new policy tools to guide the glove industry to automate and to hire Malaysians only at a wage of at least RM2,500 per month. This is a virtuous cycle for all sides. 

The glove industry is making huge profits and they should share it with Malaysians either by taxation or by creating jobs. I would prefer them to create jobs for Malaysians as this will be more sustainable in the long run, and also helps the nation now. 

Some companies among the glove industry have their production done by sweatshops with slave labour type operations, which are now giving Malaysia a bad name. With a carrot to incentivise the glove sector to automate, and with a stick to punish slave labour conditions, the government can guide the glove industry to create 50,000 semi-skilled jobs for Malaysians at RM2,500 to RM4,000 per month over a period of two years through an “automation plus Malaysianisation” programme.

2. Security guards – Malaysia hires 200,000 mostly Nepalis as security guards. The agents make huge profits. When I was deputy defence minister, I tried to persuade then home minister Muhyiddin Yassin to change the industry but to no avail, due to the ministry’s inertia and strong lobby groups. 

Ordinary soldiers retire in their 40s when they need good jobs to pay for kids’ education and food. Their pension is at least in the region of RM2,000. No one will take up a job that pays RM1,200. So many soldiers return to their villages to do odd jobs as the cost of living are lower or they became hawkers or small traders. 

But imagine if we change the whole sector altogether. Say in five years’ time, we "Malaysianise" the entire security guard business. Instead of having 200,000 security guards, we should just have 70,000 Malaysians or less. 

The government could subsidise the installation of CCTVs, and purchase body cameras, and other technologies needed for the monitoring of security situations. It can also step in to empower the workforce by introducing certain recognitions and certifications. 

For example, if a security officer is well-versed enough to use all the technologies as well as to make proper police reports when a crime occurs, they should be paid much higher, say at RM3,500 per month to start. For those who hire these security officers, they should realise the virtues of having someone who can make a proper police report, or even just point to the right road directions when asked. 

For the nation’s security, having Malaysians who are properly trained and decently paid to guard our community is surely a good thing to have. Additionally, the shopping mall-linked Covid-19 clusters in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor were mostly from foreign security guards who stayed in cramped dormitories. Time for a total revamp and Malaysianisation of this sector.

3. Green/climate – during Yeo Bee Yin’s time as energy minister, the nation made progress on Net Energy Metering (NEM) and Energy Performance Contracting (EPC). 

NEM promotes the adoption of renewable energy, through a scheme which allows private entities to feed excess energy produced by solar panels into the national grid and receive credits in return. 

An EPC service provider will come into an agreement with a building owner to change the lights into LED lights as well as to pull all tricks to conserve energy. A typical agreement would promise the owner a lower energy payment to TNB than previously. The service provider is rewarded with some parts of the saving from paying TNB. 

Imagine that the government commits to turning all its buildings into energy conservation buildings in the next two years. TNB might see a decrease in revenue, but everyone else wins: the environment wins, a new sector is created in which many contractors will have work to do and can borrow from the banks. 

The government could also give incentives to hotels, malls and factories that conduct energy and water audits and carry out retrofitting to turn their buildings into energy conservation buildings. 

The government can then come in to set standards and certification of workers, for example requiring all contractors to hire Malaysian workers, with certificates as green job technicians, and pay them at least RM3,500. Such a massive green/climate exercise would help us build back better and could create 100,000 jobs or more.

Of course, these are just a few examples. If we as a nation put our heads together to experiment, there will be many other ways to create jobs for Malaysians at RM2,500 to RM4,000 pay. 

I specify this level of pay because once we can sustain massive employment at this level, we will have strong domestic demand, and with automation and other efforts to move up the technological ladder, we will create even more jobs at a higher pay once the global economy comes back to life after Covid-19. Better pay complemented with automation – that is the way forward.

I also set it at RM2,500 to RM4,000 because it is very doable for the employers, both public and private. And it is also a level of salary that straight away will attract a long queue of Malaysians applying. Even Malaysians who work as cheap labour in Singapore, earning less than S$2,000 (RM6,000), would be willing to return on 2/3 of their previous salary, given the more affordable lifestyle.

It is time for the government to guide the industries to understand this: progress means we use less and less labour and more and more machines; progress or profit must not be built on using human beings (unskilled foreign labour) like machines. 

There is a commonly held belief that Malaysians don’t want to work in 3D sectors. But in actual fact, hundreds of thousands of Malaysians are working as 3D workers in Singapore. The key is pay.

It is time for the entire society to focus on creating jobs for Malaysians. There is no other way to realise the spirit of #kitajagakita than to create jobs for fellow Malaysians.

I urge the government to be very bold in this endeavour.

This article was first published at liewchintong.com.

LIEW CHIN TONG is a senator and former deputy defence minister.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.